Homepage / Fill Your Da 2166 9 1 Template
Article Map

The DA 2166-9-1 form is an essential tool for evaluating the performance and potential of non-commissioned officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. This evaluation report, specifically designed for sergeants, plays a critical role in the professional development of military personnel. It encompasses various sections that capture vital administrative data, including the NCO's name, rank, and unit information, as well as the evaluation period. The form requires input from multiple rating officials, including a rater and a senior rater, ensuring a comprehensive assessment. Each section is meticulously structured to evaluate the NCO's duty performance, character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and overall achievement. The rater provides detailed observations, while the senior rater assesses the NCO's potential relative to peers. Additionally, the form includes a counseling component, allowing for constructive feedback and acknowledgment of the NCO's understanding of the evaluation process. This multifaceted approach not only promotes accountability but also fosters a culture of continuous improvement within the ranks.

Misconceptions

Many people have misunderstandings about the DA 2166 9 1 form, which is used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs). Here are five common misconceptions:

  • The form is only for negative evaluations. This is not true. The DA 2166 9 1 form can be used to recognize both strengths and areas for improvement in an NCO’s performance.
  • Only the rater's opinion matters. While the rater's assessment is important, the senior rater also plays a significant role in evaluating the NCO's potential. Both perspectives are crucial for a comprehensive evaluation.
  • Signing the form means agreeing with the evaluation. The signature of the rated NCO does not imply agreement or disagreement. It simply indicates that the NCO has seen the report and verifies the administrative data is correct.
  • The form is not confidential. In fact, the DA 2166 9 1 form contains sensitive personal information. It is protected under the Privacy Act, and proper care must be taken to secure it.
  • The evaluation process is straightforward and quick. The evaluation process can be complex and time-consuming. It involves multiple steps, including counseling dates and input from different raters, which may take time to complete thoroughly.

Common mistakes

Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form is a crucial task for non-commissioned officers, yet many individuals make common mistakes that can lead to complications. One frequent error occurs in the administrative data section. Often, people either forget to include their full name or provide incorrect information such as the Social Security Number (SSN) or Department of Defense Identification Number (DOD ID). This oversight can delay the evaluation process and create unnecessary confusion.

Another mistake involves the dates. Individuals sometimes enter the wrong dates for the period covered by the evaluation or fail to include the full range of dates. This can lead to misunderstandings about the evaluation period and may even affect the overall assessment of performance. It is essential to double-check these dates to ensure accuracy.

In Part II, the authentication section, individuals may overlook the requirement for signatures from the rater and senior rater. Failing to obtain these signatures can render the evaluation invalid. Additionally, some may neglect to provide the correct email addresses for the rating officials, which can hinder communication and the processing of the evaluation.

Lastly, in the performance evaluation section, common errors include vague or incomplete comments. Raters sometimes do not provide specific examples of performance, which can diminish the value of the evaluation. It is vital to articulate strengths and areas for improvement clearly. Doing so not only helps the rated NCO understand their performance but also supports their professional development.

Detailed Guide for Writing Da 2166 9 1

Completing the DA 2166-9-1 form is an important step in the evaluation process for Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs). After filling out the form, it will need to be submitted to the appropriate authorities for review and processing. Below are the steps to help you accurately fill out this form.

  1. Administrative Data: Start with Part I. Fill in your name (last, first, middle initial), Social Security Number (or DOD ID No.), rank, date of rank, PMOSC, unit or organization, station, ZIP code or APO, major command, status code, UIC, reason for submission, and the period covered (from and thru). Indicate the rated months, nonrated codes, number of enclosures, and your email address.
  2. Authentication: Move to Part II. Enter the name, SSN, signature, and date for the rater, along with their rank, PMOSC/branch, organization, duty assignment, and email address. Repeat this process for the senior rater, ensuring all information is accurate.
  3. Supplementary Review: If applicable, fill out the supplementary reviewer section. Provide their name, rank, PMOSC/organization, and whether a review is required. Include comments, signature, date, and email address for the supplementary reviewer.
  4. Counseling Dates: Under the rated NCO section, list the initial and later counseling dates. Sign and date to acknowledge understanding of the report's contents and the appeals process.
  5. Duty Description: In Part III, describe your principal duty title, duty MOSC, daily duties and scope, areas of special emphasis, and any appointed duties.
  6. Performance Evaluation: Proceed to Part IV. Document your APFT results, including pass/fail/profile status, height, weight, and whether you are within standards. Provide comments as necessary. Then evaluate character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement, indicating whether each area met or did not meet standards, along with comments.
  7. Senior Rater Overall Potential: In Part V, select the appropriate box for the rated NCO’s potential compared to others. Provide comments and list two successive assignments and one broadening assignment.

After completing these steps, review the form for accuracy and completeness. Ensure all required signatures are obtained before submission. This will help streamline the evaluation process and ensure that all necessary information is provided.